When Conscience Wears the Robe - Magistrate R Wong

When Conscience Wears the Robe - Magistrate R Wong

On 20 November 2025, a routine court hearing at Blacktown Local Court revealed a rare moment of integrity in the justice system. The matter involved a self-represented defendant seeking nothing more than fairness — an opportunity to be heard and to prepare properly. What unfolded that day went beyond procedure; it became a quiet testament to judicial courage and the true meaning of justice.

In a time when many lose faith in the fairness of our justice system, there are moments that remind us that courage still lives within the walls of our courts. On 20 November 2025, at Blacktown Court, one such moment took place — quiet, unassuming, yet profoundly powerful.

Presiding Magistrate Rachael Wong faced a courtroom charged with tension. On one side stood the prosecution, fortified by the force of authority, armed with procedure and pressure. On the other stood an unrepresented citizen — a woman struggling not only with the weight of her case but with illness and exhaustion, fighting to be heard.

The hearing had been set for weeks, yet the prosecution only served the brief of evidence on the very morning of the hearing — around 10:30 a.m. on 20 November 2025. This last-minute service left no fair opportunity to review witness statements or transcripts essential to preparing a defence. Despite this delay and unwellness of the defendant, the prosecution insisted on proceeding immediately, showing little regard for due process or the principles of fairness that underpin every courtroom.

Despite the loud voices of the prosecutors and the procedural complexities before her, Magistrate Wong did not bend to expedience. She listened. She saw fairness not as a formality but as a living duty. She understood that justice is not served by silencing those who stand alone, but by ensuring they are given equal ground to speak.

When the prosecutors pressed for costs — an intimidating move that could have silenced many — the Magistrate instead chose the harder path: to uphold fairness. She dismissed the application for costs, reaffirming that justice is not about who speaks the loudest, but about who stands for what is right.

In that courtroom, law became more than words in a statute. It became compassion in action.

The courage of one judicial officer restored faith in the integrity of the bench — showing that even amid procedural storms and prosecutorial pressure, truth and fairness can still prevail when the robe is worn with conscience.

Anyone can wear a robe, but conscience is not a trait that comes with a position. It is an individual trademark — and NSW Magistrate Rachael Wong clearly carried hers with honour.


Case Particulars

  • Matter Title: R v MARIUM

  • Case Number: 2025/00237982

  • Date of Hearing: 20 November 2025

  • Court: Blacktown Local Court, Room 2

  • Presiding Magistrate: Her Honour Magistrate Rachael Wong

More Blog Posts

Section 223: How Power Became Arbitrary?

Section 223: How Power Became Arbitrary?

After a successful court appearance, Marium Marium was issued a licence suspension under Section 223 without medical review or lawful grounds. She has lodged a formal complaint with NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon, now under assessment by the Professional Standards Unit. The case raises questions about procedural fairness and the use of discretionary police powers toward individuals with stable medical conditions.

When Conscience Wears the Robe - Magistrate R Wong

When Conscience Wears the Robe - Magistrate R Wong

On 20 November 2025, during R v MARIUM – OPEN (2025/00237982) at Blacktown Local Court, NSW Magistrate Rachael Wong demonstrated exceptional fairness and integrity. Despite pressure from prosecutors, she upheld the principles of justice by ensuring a self-represented defendant received a fair opportunity to prepare their case. Her conduct stood as a reminder that true justice depends not on power or position, but on conscience and courage.

Rewarding Fraud: Open Season for Australian Migration Agents

Rewarding Fraud: Open Season for Australian Migration Agents

In Sharma v Minister (SYG1613/2023), accused migration agents avoided joinder. A human rights defender warns this leaves victims without meaningful remedies.

From Directions to Decision Shortcut: A Failure of Natural Justice

From Directions to Decision Shortcut: A Failure of Natural Justice

On 25 Sept 2025, a matter listed as a directions hearing was turned into a determination without notice. Submissions from the Minister and proposed respondents arrived less than 24 hours before. Natural justice denied, echoing a failure that risks leaving future generations burdened with stolen rights and fairness.

National Security or Religious Persecution? Hindu Govt Under Fire

National Security or Religious Persecution? Hindu Govt Under Fire

Trent Franks condemns India’s Hindu government for banning Sikh pilgrimage, calling it hypocrisy and a violation of faith rights.

Silencing the Wunna Nyiyaparli

Silencing the Wunna Nyiyaparli

The story of the Wunna Nyiyaparli native title claim shows how procedural shortcuts silenced a people. From the separate question trap (2015) to the one-sided verdict (2016) and the 2018 consent determination, this case exposes the gap between apology and justice in Australia.